Soch audits how your firm actually works — department by department, person by person — then sets up the right Claude tools for each team: chat, Projects, Cowork or Code. No one-size-fits-all, no tools you won't use. On-site in Tallinn, backed by remote delivery.
We scope your program together in 30 minutes · No commitment
productivity lift for workers given a gen-AI assistant in an NBER field study — 35% for the least experienced
average hours saved per 40-hour week by workers using generative AI (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)
higher output quality in a 758-consultant field experiment when AI was used inside its capability frontier
Independent research — NBER w31161, St. Louis Fed (Feb 2025), Harvard/BCG field experiment. Not Soch's numbers.
Everyone on your team has typed into a chat box. Almost no firm has moved past it — to Claude that knows their context (Projects), does multi-step work on their files while they do something else (Cowork), and carries the firm's own way of working in reusable Skills. That gap is the opportunity — and the firms that close it first get the throughput edge over everyone still prompting one tab at a time.
The Claude ecosystem has four very different tools, and the wrong one is wasted money and wasted training. So every engagement starts with an audit of how your firm actually works — then each person gets matched to the tool their work needs, and nothing they don't.
We sit with each department and map the real daily tasks, tools and bottlenecks — person by person, not a generic survey.
You get a Claude tooling map: who needs chat, who needs Projects, who needs Cowork, who needs Code — matched to the work.
We set up exactly those tools on your real work, connected to your files — in the Setup Day or across the Sprint.
Named owners, one metric per team, full handover. Capability that compounds — not tools that gather dust.
Claude isn't one thing. Part of the audit is deciding which of these each person actually needs — most firms end up with a mix.
What it is: ask, draft, summarise and research in the moment, in a conversation.
Best for: everyone, day one — turning notes into a letter, triaging an inbox, synthesising a few sources.
What it is: Claude that permanently knows your context — templates, tone, SOPs, past work.
Best for: anyone who does the same kind of work repeatedly — a client's tone of voice, a firm's drafting style.
What it is: delegate multi-step work on a folder of files — Claude runs it while you do something else, on a schedule if needed.
Best for: repetitive, multi-file jobs — processing a folder of invoices, drafting the monthly report from raw exports.
What it is: build internal tools, connect systems and package firm-wide Skills — the technical end of the ecosystem.
Best for: your ops or technical lead and power users — a small internal tool, a data pipeline, reusable Skills at scale.
Illustrative — your actual map comes out of the audit, built on your real departments and tasks.
Both tracks open the same way: a needs audit and your Claude tooling map, then we set up exactly the tools each team needs — chat, Projects, Cowork or Code — before we leave the building. The Sprint then takes every department from Claude user to Claude builder — their own Projects, Skills and Cowork workflows.
Week one is the same for every firm. Weeks two to four are built for how your industry actually works. Pick yours to see the full curriculum, the Skills and workflows your teams build, and what practitioners in your field report.
First-draft pleadings and contracts from your own templates, bundle review, a citation-verification protocol, and intake-to-engagement automation. Confidentiality answered first.
Document intake that classifies itself, client emails that draft themselves, month-end close assistants and onboarding/KYC packs — minutes per client file, shrunk.
CV screening against your real scorecards, interview-note synthesis, outreach in each consultant's voice, and weekly client pipeline digests — more placements per consultant.
Tone-of-voice engines per client, self-writing reports, briefs and proposals from account history, and content-variant pipelines — twice the output, craft intact.
This isn't a mixed classroom. Each program is delivered privately to your firm — your people, your tools, your client work. Because the foundation day happens on-site in Tallinn, we take a small number of companies per intake.
One foundation day per company. We don't stack firms into shared sessions — the room is yours.
September intake: 4 slots. October intake: 4 slots. Scoping calls now; slots confirmed first-come.
Rizwan is on-site in Tallinn for the foundation day. Soch's technical team runs the remote build weeks and support channel.
Up to 30 people per on-site session. Larger firms split into two sessions or route extra departments through the Sprint's remote labs.
Between touchpoints, your team keeps a direct line to Soch — questions answered while the habit is forming, not at the next meeting.
The Setup Day is Module 1 on its own. The Capability Sprint runs all four — one module per week. Click a module to expand it.
Week 1 · on-site in Tallinn · 3.5 hours
What people use it for on day one:
Week 2 · remote · function-specific tracks
The firm splits into function tracks. Each track learns to use Claude well — prompting precisely, getting reliable outputs — then builds its own capability inside the Claude ecosystem: a Claude Project loaded with the right firm context, reusable Skills that capture the team's output formats, tone and templates, and Cowork workflows that run the repetitive multi-step jobs. Everything the team builds is theirs to keep and extend. See the industry curricula for how the labs run in your field.
Week 3 · async + review session
Week 4 · showcase + handover
Find the highest-value work in each role and hand it to Claude Cowork — briefings, document processing, reporting, follow-ups — so the multi-step jobs run while your team does the thinking.
Every person configures Claude Projects around how they work — their files, their templates, their writing voice — so it stops starting from zero.
Reusable Claude Skills with named owners and metrics capture the way your firm works — so capability compounds instead of evaporating after the workshop glow.
Flat, per company, all-in for the full on-site day. Where you land in the range depends on team size and how much setup your systems need.
Per company, for all four weeks. Priced by headcount and the number of department tracks you run. No day rates, no scope creep.
No day rates, no scope creep, no surprises after week one. You get the exact figure on the scoping call — and it stays fixed for the whole engagement.
The standard route is weeks of analysis before anything gets built. Ours is a quick, focused audit that produces a tooling map — then working tools on day one, decisions made from real use instead of projections.
We're not a which-tool-should-you-pick survey. Soch works deep in the Claude ecosystem — chat, Projects, Cowork, Skills and Claude Code — and knows exactly what each does inside a professional-services firm.
The audit matches each person to the tool their work needs — and says so when someone only needs chat. No one pays for or trains on Cowork or Code they won't use.
Every automation leaves with a named internal owner and a success metric. Adoption that survives the month after we're gone is the whole point.
Every firm asks this before they commit. These aren't caveats — they're the constraints that shape how we design every workflow.
Hallucination is documented, consistent, and not going away. Claude fabricates case citations, states incorrect figures, and produces plausible-sounding errors with no uncertainty. Every workflow we build includes a human verification step for any factual output. This is a design constraint, not a footnote.
Client strategy, ethical calls, complex negotiations, creative direction — Claude doesn't make these decisions. It writes the draft so the lawyer focuses on the argument. It screens the CVs so the recruiter focuses on the conversation. The professional decides; Claude does the typing.
Claude works with what you give it — the files in a Cowork folder, a Project's context, a connected app. It won't reach into a system you haven't connected, and it isn't a live feed of your firm. We design each Project, Skill and Cowork workflow around exactly what it can see, so your team is never surprised by a gap.
Claude can handle long documents — but not a 400-page case bundle or a year's worth of inbox in one go. Cowork workflows are built to process in stages: chunk, summarise, escalate. We build this into the workflow so your team doesn't have to think about it.
Partners spent evenings turning notes into client letters and engagement summaries. In one day, every lawyer had a Claude Project tuned to the firm's templates and Cowork drafting from their own files.
Built: matter-summary drafts, letter first-passes, morning case briefings.
Consultants drowned in CV triage and interview notes. Across four weeks, the sourcing, delivery and back-office teams each built their own Skills and Cowork workflows in the department labs.
Built: CV shortlist screener, interview-note summaries, candidate follow-up sequences — one named owner each.
Three functions, three tracks, three demo-day workflows. The support team's ticket-triage Skill became the internal template for the next two departments to copy.
Built: reconciliation checks, ticket triage & routing, weekly ops reporting pack.
Representative scenarios showing the shape of a typical engagement — first Tallinn cohort case studies will be published as they complete. Research numbers are from independent studies (NBER, St. Louis Fed, Harvard/BCG), not Soch results.
Book a free scoping call. We'll map your team to the right track and give you an exact, flat price.
Within two business days we come back with a few questions about your team and goals.
We map your departments and tasks, recommend the right Claude tools, and give you an exact, flat price.
Program plan and exact flat price. No commitment required to see it.